On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:16:19AM +1000, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > As has been reported on this list, this option is really harmful on
> > current xfs - in my case, it lead to xfs causing ENOSPC even when the disk
> > was 40% empty (~188gb).
>
> Seeing you keep stating this is a problem,
I can only go by what _you_ told me earlier, namely that this works as
designed and no change is needed. If you changed your mind without telling
me, how should I find out?
If you say one thing and do another, you shouldn't be surprised when
people trust you and go by what you say.
> commit 778e24b ("xfs: reset inode per-lifetime state when recycling
> it") fixed this problem for you?
If you tell me in which kernel version this is included, I can find out
easily.
--
The choice of a Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG
-----==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net
----==-- _ generation
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / schmorp@xxxxxxxxxx
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
