On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 06:48:13AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Why yare all these sigaction calls needed? As far as I can see > there is no way we'll ever use a different signal handler than > "sigaction" for any signal, so simply modifying the signal mask > should be enough. Sorry, the on eand only signal handler is called "sighandler" of course. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
