On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 03:40:09PM -0500, Bill Kendall wrote: > Looking forward towards a multi-threaded xfsdump, it's simpler to > handle pipe failures as a system call failure (EPIPE) rather than > through a signal handler which may run in a separate thread. The > existing error handling code handles EPIPE just fine, so the only > required change is to ignore SIGPIPE. Some sections of code already > temporarily ignore SIGPIPE -- they no longer need to do so since it > will already be ignored. Looks good, and the less we do with signals, the better. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
