On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:35:13AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > The Pavel's objection, if I remember it correctly, was that some > (or the majority of?) filesystems didn't implement the freezing operation, > so they would be more vulnerable to data loss in case of a failing hibernation > after this change. However, that's better than actively causing pain to XFS > users. The objection never made sense and only means he never read the code. freeze_super (or freeze_bdev back then) always does a sync_filesystem before even checking if we have a freeze method, and sync_filesystem is what we iterate over for each superblock in sync(). _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
