On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:09:59AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 03:31:27PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > > It is preferable that no dirty pages are dispatched from the page > > reclaim path. If reclaim is encountering dirty pages, it implies that > > either reclaim is getting ahead of writeback or use-once logic has > > prioritise pages for reclaiming that are young relative to when the > > inode was dirtied. > > what does this buy us? Very little. The vague intention was to avoid a situation where kswapds priority was raised such that it had to write pages to clean a particular zone. > If at all we should prioritize by a zone, > e.g. tell write_cache_pages only to bother with writing things out > if the dirty page is in a given zone. We'd probably still cluster > around it to make sure we get good I/O patterns, but would only start > I/O if it has a page we actually care about. > That would make more sense. I've dropped this patch entirely. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
