On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 05:43 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Remove the tag member which is at a variable offset after the actual
> name, and make name a real variable sized C99 array instead of the incorrect
> one-sized array which confuses (not only) gcc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
One comment, but looks good.
Oh, and also, fix spelling of "definition" in the subject
line here and in other patches in this series.
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>
> Index: xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_data.h
> ===================================================================
> --- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_data.h 2011-06-29 13:42:35.521563513 +0200
> +++ xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_data.h 2011-06-29 13:43:03.284746440 +0200
> @@ -98,14 +98,14 @@ typedef struct xfs_dir2_data_hdr {
>
> /*
> * Active entry in a data block. Aligned to 8 bytes.
> - * Tag appears as the last 2 bytes.
> + *
> + * After the variable length name field there is a 2 byte tag field, which
> + * can be accessed using xfs_dir2_data_entry_tag_p.
> */
> typedef struct xfs_dir2_data_entry {
> __be64 inumber; /* inode number */
> __u8 namelen; /* name length */
> - __u8 name[1]; /* name bytes, no null */
> - /* variable offset */
> - __be16 tag; /* starting offset of us */
> + __u8 name[]; /* name bytes, no null */
Maybe put the comment about the tag field here, as
was done elsewhere. (But the pictures are even
better...)
> } xfs_dir2_data_entry_t;
>
> /*
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
