On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:01:24AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > The list field of it is never cactually used, so all uses can simply be > replaced with the xfs_dir2_sf_hdr_t type that it has as first member. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> I can't help but think this would have been a much smaller patch if you rolled the contents of the xfs_dir2_sf_hdr_t into xfs_dir2_sf_t and killed the xfs_dir2_sf_hdr_t instead. There's many more occurrences of xfs_dir2_sf_t than there are xfs_dir2_sf_hdr_t. Anyway, gotta run now so I'll look at this more later.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
