From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
The operation flags parameter to fallocate is the second parameter,
not the last. Hence the fpunch test is actually testing for falloc
support, not fpunch. Somebody needs a brown paper bag.
Also, add a ftruncate call whenthe fpunch succeeds just in case the
file was not already zero sized. Failing to ensure we start with a
zero length file can cause read ops to fail size checks if they
occur before the file is written to be the main test loop.
While there, observe the quiet flag the same as the falloc test
does and have them both emit the warning at the same error level.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
ltp/fsx.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ltp/fsx.c b/ltp/fsx.c
index 0683853..a37e223 100644
--- a/ltp/fsx.c
+++ b/ltp/fsx.c
@@ -1243,7 +1243,7 @@ test_fallocate()
if (!lite && fallocate_calls) {
if (fallocate(fd, 0, 0, 1) && errno == EOPNOTSUPP) {
if(!quiet)
- prt("fsx: main: filesystem does not support fallocate, disabling\n");
+ warn("main: filesystem does not support fallocate, disabling\n");
fallocate_calls = 0;
} else {
ftruncate(fd, 0);
@@ -1260,13 +1260,13 @@ test_punch_hole()
{
#ifdef FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE
if (!lite && punch_hole_calls) {
- if (fallocate(fd, 0, 0,
- FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE | FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE) &&
- errno == EOPNOTSUPP) {
-
- warn("main: filesystem does not support fallocate punch hole, disabling");
+ if (fallocate(fd, FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE | FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE,
+ 0, 1) && errno == EOPNOTSUPP) {
+ if(!quiet)
+ warn("main: filesystem does not support fallocate punch hole, disabling");
punch_hole_calls = 0;
- }
+ } else
+ ftruncate(fd, 0);
}
#else /* ! PUNCH HOLE */
punch_hole_calls = 0;
--
1.7.5.1
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
