Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: Silence bounds checking compiler warning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> gcc with -Warray-bounds generates a false positive on this
> since xfs defines the struct with u8 name[1]; to be able to
> add a tag at the end.

A better way would be to define it as name[0]. Then the compiler
would know it's a VLA. You may need to check noone relies on
the one byte though.

-Andi
-- 
ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs


[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux