On 6/16/11 12:57 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 12:33:49PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> Actually this looks like it's a result of >> >> 6e857567dbbfe14dd6cc3f7414671b047b1ff5c7 xfs: don't truncate prealloc from frequently accessed inodes >> >> I thought Dave's patch from the "Re: drastic changes to allocsize semantics in or around 2.6.38?" >> thread would fix it, but it doesn't seem to. Here it is anyway ;) > > It should fix the thing about the preallocation staying when removing > and recreating the file. Keeping pre-allocate blocks around otherwise > is a considered a feature. It strikes me as odd that truncating & rewriting would lead to different preallocation though .. I'll let Dave chime in. Thanks, -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
