On 6/16/11 12:05 AM, Manish Aggarwal wrote: > Hi Eric, > > Thanks for responding. Yes I agree most of the Test Cases are failed > due to the umount failure. > > But isn't the "quick and auto" group are supposed to run without any > error? Yes, but if that were guaranteed, there would be no reason to run them! :) > The point is in case I am running xfstest suite on some target, how > would I know that whether the there is some error with my target (or > kernel settings) or if there is some error in xfs test suite itself. The test suite is not perfect; it evolves, and there are bugs in it as with any other software. It is your role as a developer and as a user of the test suite to investigate failures, and discern where the problem lies. In general, the test suite works. Busy filesystems at unmount are not a common result, so you need to try to find out why you are running into that, and what the root cause may be ... Running on a usb stick is not something the core xfs developers do, so you may well run into unique issues. -Eric > Regards, Manish _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
