On 06/10/2011 01:45 PM, Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
> Test 049 depends on ext2 module being supported by the kernel.
>
> This patch makes it a explicit, instead of failing the test with
> obscure message.
>
> Signed-Off-By: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/049 b/049
> index 3d3f030..c6c4faa 100755
> --- a/049
> +++ b/049
> @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ _require_nobigloopfs
> _require_nonexternal
> _require_scratch
> _require_loop
> +_require_ext2
>
> rm -f $seq.full
>
> diff --git a/common.rc b/common.rc
> index c510c66..531a43e 100644
> --- a/common.rc
> +++ b/common.rc
> @@ -769,6 +769,23 @@ _require_loop()
> fi
> }
>
> +# this test requires ext2 filesystem support
> +#
> +_require_ext2()
> +{
> + if [ "$HOSTOS" != "Linux" ]
> + then
> + _notrun "This test requires linux for ext2 filesystem support"
> + fi
> +
> + if modprobe ext2 >/dev/null 2>&1
Does this do the right thing if ext2 is built in?
If not, would :
modprobe ext2 >/dev/null 2>&1
grep ext2 /proc/filesystems ...
work better?
-Eric
> + then
> + :
> + else
> + _notrun "This test requires ext2 filesystem support"
> + fi
> +}
> +
> # this test requires that (large) loopback device files are not in use
> #
> _require_nobigloopfs()
>
>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
