Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > If space efficiency is a consideration then smaller blocksizes might > be useful. Not so much for hits per day, but for how many files you > expect to store at any one time; you'll waste ((blocksize / 2) * nr > files) on average. > space is not likely an issue at all. if there is no efficiency issue the usage of 4096 bytes hardly seems significant. so thx eric and michael for your input on this! we'll leave things alone. :D -- in friendship, prad _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
