On 22.05.2011 12:00, Dave Chinner wrote: > > I don't really care what you think the problem is based on what > you've read in this email thread, or for that matter how you think > we should fix it. What I really want is your test cases that > reproduce the problem so I can analyse it for myself. Once I > understand what is going on, then we can talk about what the real > problem is and how to fix it. What would interest me is why the following creates files with large preallocations. cp -a <somedir> target rm -rf target cp -a <somedir> target After the first copy everything looks normal, `du` is about the original value. After the second run a `du` shows a much higher value, until the preallocation is shrunk away. Bis denn -- Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated, cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
