On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 15:14 -0500, Alex Elder wrote: > From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > xfs_alert_tag() can be defined using xfs_alert(), and thereby avoid > using xfs_printk() altogether. This is the only remaining use of > xfs_printk(), so changing it this way means xfs_printk() can simply > be eliminated.can simply be eliminated.can simply be eliminated.can > simply be eliminated.can simply be eliminated.can simply be > eliminated.can simply be eliminated.can simply be eliminated.can > simply be eliminated. Recursion overflow? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
