Re: XFS stack overflow?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 03:18:55PM +0100, simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> x86_64
> Storage is fibrechannel attached and the filesystem is hosted on a 
> LVM block device that concatentates four partitions, so the block access
> is going via a stack of LVM, multipath and Q-logic drivers.
> Network is Intel 10G ethernet (gxbe driver)
> Kernel is 2.6.32 with Debian patches. (both kernels)

Yes, this very much looks like a stack overflow caused by direct
reclaim from a context with a lot of stack usage into a filesystem (XFS
in this case) with a deep storage stack underneath.

The fix for this is to disable direct reclaim, which the VM maintainers
refuse.  We finally gave in and added a hack similar to the other
modern filesystems to prevent this from inside XFS.

Try backporting commits:

	"xfs: skip writeback from reclaim context"

and

	"xfs: allow writeback from kswapd"

from current mainline to avoid these kinds of issues.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs


[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux