2011/3/29 KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > If my remember is correct, 2.6.38 is included Mel's anti agressive > reclaim patch. And original report seems to be using 2.6.37.x. > > John, can you try 2.6.38? I'll ask my boss about it. Unfortunately we found opposite issue with memory management + XFS (100M of inodes) on 2.6.38: some objects in xfs_inode and dentry slabs are seems to be never cleared (at least without "sync && echo 2 >.../drop_caches"). But this is not a production machine working 24x7, so we don't care about it right now. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
