On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 04:03:19PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote: > > + * Can be trimmed to: > > + * +-------+ OR +-------+ > > + * fbno fend fbno fend > > + * > > + * We prefer the lower bno extent because the next > > + * allocation for this inode will use "end" as the > > + * target for first block. If the busy segment has > > ...will use the updated value of fend as the target... I've replaced all these comments based on the text you replied to the last round (finally..) _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs