Re: [PATCH] xfs: preallocation transactions do not need to be synchronous

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 02:36:34AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> I had the same patch in my queue, but it turns out even that isn't
> enough for good performance when used fallocate in the fast path (e.g.
> recent Samba).  I'll send a more comprehensive optimization that
> includes this soon.
> 
> I also refactored the whole area to make the various flags more
> sensible.

Given that 2.6.38 is out now and I won't have my series ready in time
I'm fine with putting your minimal version in for now, I'll port mine
on top.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs


[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux