On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 12:14:44PM -0600, Alex Elder wrote: > 3) Why are you dropping the use of the symbols > XFS_DINODE_VERSION_1 and XFS_DINODE_VERSION_2 in > favor of just using 1 and 2? (I guess I'm OK with > it, but wanted to call it out anyway.) Because we dropped them from the kernel a while ago. The removal in kernel land was my patch and the reason is that it simply doesn't buy anything over using the numerical constants. > - XFS_IOC_FREEZE and XFS_IOC_THAW are still defined in > this version. The code that uses it here could possibly > be converted to use the Linux generic FIFREEZE and FITHAW > instead. That would require all users to include <linux/fs.h> first. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
