On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 21:56 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 04:17:48PM -0800, Chandra Seetharaman wrote: > > Hello All, > > > > I see the following Oops when I run the test 070 on power Architecture. > > Looking at the code, I do not see anything that is popping out as a > > problem. > > > > I do not see the same failures in x86_64, so, I thought it may be due to > > the pagesize, so changed the pagesize to be 4k, but that didn't help. > > > > Is this assertion a false-positive ? > > > > If not, Any suggestions on where to start looking at the code. > > > > I see the same Oops with 2.6.37, 2.6.38-rc2 and 2.6.38-rc3. > > It's an assert failure, not an oops: Sorry for the misfiling :) (it does print an oops thouth).. > > > Feb 3 14:01:30 mytestmachine kernel: Assertion failed: args->op_flags & XFS_DA_OP_OKNOENT, file: fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c, line: 1428 > > XFS_DA_OP_OKNOENT is set when an operation on the > directory/attribute can be expected to get an ENOENT error. > If it is not set, then the attribute/dirent is expected to be > present in the tree, and there's something wrong if it is not. > > e.g. if you are removing an attribute, it is expected to be in the > tree. > > PowerPC used to get regular QA coverage but hasn't for the past > couple of years, so it probably is a relatively recent problem. > I'd suggest the first thing to do is to try older kernels to > determine if the problem is specific to newer kernels, and if so, a > git bisect is probably your best bet to finding the commit that > introduced the problem. Thanks for the suggestion. I will follow through. > > Cheers, > > Dave. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
