Re: [PATCH 3/3] libxfs: sync files with 2.6.38 kernel code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 03:57:51AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > +/* XXX: fix this up! */
> >  #define	OFF(f)	bitize(offsetof(xfs_dinode_t, di_ ## f))
> >  const field_t	inode_flds[] = {
> > -	{ "core", FLDT_DINODE_CORE, OI(OFF(core)), C1, 0, TYP_NONE },
> > -	{ "next_unlinked", FLDT_AGINO, OI(OFF(next_unlinked)), C1, 0,
> > -	  TYP_INODE },
> > -	{ "u", FLDT_DINODE_U, OI(OFF(u)), C1, 0, TYP_NONE },
> > +	{ "core", FLDT_DINODE_CORE, OI(OFF(magic)), C1, 0, TYP_NONE },
> > +	{ "u", FLDT_DINODE_U, inode_u_offset, C1, FLD_OFFSET, TYP_NONE },
> 
> I think the right way to fix this is to copy over all fields from
> the dinode core, and keep a "virtual" core field and the inode_core
> table for backwards compatiblity.

OK. By "virtual" core field, do you mean something like what I have
about, or something different?

> > +	{ "next_unlinked", FLDT_AGINO, OI(OFF(next_unlinked)), C1, 0,
> > +	  TYP_INODE },
> 
> I think this one should only be added to the real dinode, not the core.

Good catch. I mixed up what was in xfs_icdinode and xfs_dinode
there.

> 
> >  #define XFS_BUF_LOCK			0
> >  #define XFS_BUF_TRYLOCK			0
> > +#define XBF_LOCK			XFS_BUF_LOCK
> > +#define XBF_TRYLOCK			XFS_BUF_TRYLOCK
> > +#define XBF_DONT_BLOCK			0
> 
> Please kill off the XFS_BUF_* flags, just like in kernelspace.

Will do.

Thanks for spending the time to look over these huge patches,
Christoph.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs


[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux