> + /* > + * make sure we don't exceed a single > + * extent length when we align the > + * extent by reducing length we are > + * going to allocate by the maximum > + * amount extent size aligment may > + * require. > + alen = (xfs_extlen_t)XFS_FILBLKS_MIN( > + len, > + MAXEXTLEN - (2 * extsz - 1)); > + */ This essentially just adds a comment, given that the new code is inside the bracing. Also the xfs_extlen_t cast seems pointless. The C type promotion rules do just fine for going down from a 64bit type to a 32bit one, as long as the results fit into the latter - which they always do here. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
