Re: [PATCH 2/8] xfs: factor common post-write isize handling code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 15:48 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 

With one exception noted below, this looks good.

Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>

> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_file.c |   52 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

. . .

> @@ -742,16 +755,7 @@ write_retry:
>  
>  	current->backing_dev_info = NULL;
>  
> -	isize = i_size_read(inode);
> -	if (unlikely(ret < 0 && ret != -EFAULT && iocb->ki_pos > isize))
> -		iocb->ki_pos = isize;
> -
> -	if (iocb->ki_pos > ip->i_size) {
> -		xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
> -		if (iocb->ki_pos > ip->i_size)
> -			ip->i_size = iocb->ki_pos;
> -		xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
> -	}
> +	xfs_aio_write_isize_update(inode, &iocb->ki_pos, ret);
>  
>  	if (ret <= 0)
>  		goto out_unlock_internal;

Just below this point in the original code there is a
call to XFS_STATS_ADD(xs_write_bytes, ret); that also
needs to be removed, because xfs_aio_write_isize_update()
now does it for you.


_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs


[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux