Ok, my fault for asking to avoid stalling xfssyncd. > Fix this by making the log covering transaction synchronous. To > avoid additional log force from xfssyncd, make the log covering > transaction take the place of the existing log force in the xfssyncd > background sync process. This also looks correct to me. We replace a force with a lsn-force, but given that we just started the transaction those should be equivalent. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
