On 12/23/10 12:06 PM, Justin Piszcz wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Dec 2010, Justin Piszcz wrote: > > > Hi, > > How come parted using (optimal at 1mb alignment is slower than no > partition? because parted got it wrong, sounds like. > In addition, sunit and swidth set properly as mentioned > earlier appears to be _slower_ than defaults with no partitions. stripe unit over an incorrectly aligned partition won't help and I suppose could make it worse. align your partitions, using sector units, to a stripe width unit. Set the stripe width properly on the fs on top of that. -Eric > > http://home.comcast.net/~jpiszcz/20101223/final.html > > Justin. > _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
