> hm that's a little confusing, what it means is it looked > in /proc/mounts and did not find anything, or so it thought. I agree that it's confusing, while there are xfs mounted rw in /proc/mounts > As a result of: > > 89e4b5bd5615edc584a5111c86f12b4f89f8dd7d xfs_fsr: use /proc/mounts if available I "quickly and dirty" tried to use /etc/mtab instead, but the result is the same. Even tried some old version (3.0.3), which uses mtab and it's the same. > What does your /proc/mounts show? it shows the lines included in the original e-mail, just here it is wrapped, i.e. for the not working case: >> ... >> /dev/mapper/root / xfs >> rw,noatime,attr2,inode64,logbufs=8,logbsize=256k,noquota 0 0 >> ... and for working case: >> ... >> /dev/root / xfs >> rw,noatime,attr2,delaylog,inode64,logbufs=8,logbsize=256k,noquota 0 0 >> /dev/mapper/encrypted /home xfs >> rw,noatime,attr2,delaylog,inode64,logbufs=8,logbsize=256k,sunit=512,swidth=1536,noquota >> 0 0 >> ... Honza
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
