On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 08:50:50AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > What tests? I couldn't really see a pattern yet - it's different ones and different amount of warnings during each run. > So this is saying is that a 20ms uninterruptible sleep lasting for more > than 120s? Doesn't that imply some kind of scheduler starvation, not > an actual XFS problem? It does for sure look odd to me. I'll do a sub-commit bisect between the two hunk in the patch tomorrow to drill a bit deeper into what's going on. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
