On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:58 PM, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hmmm. Looks like we broke recursive inode locking in
> xfs_trans_iget() in commit aa72a5cf00001d0b952c7c755be404b9118ceb2e
> ("xfs: simplify xfs_trans_iget").
> What we didn't take into account is multiple RT allocator calls in
> the same transaction context. Let me think about the best way to fix
> this.
Is there any news on this? Maybe some patch I could try out?
Regards,
Denny
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
