On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 07:56:01AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:58:56AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > This series effectively means that the buffer cache can now be made > > independent of the page cache as we now have our own optimised > > buffer cache reclaim mechanisms. > > What happened to that part of the first series? Implementing the > sub-page blocksize support using kmalloc should be fairly straight > forward. I haven't had time to implement a new version of it yet. I've still got the get_free_page version of it around, I just need to update and test it. Hopefully I'll get that done in the next couple of days... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
