On Tue 16-11-10 12:16:11, Jan Kara wrote: > On Mon 15-11-10 12:05:18, Josef Bacik wrote: > > diff --git a/fs/open.c b/fs/open.c > > index 4197b9e..ab8dedf 100644 > > --- a/fs/open.c > > +++ b/fs/open.c > > @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ int do_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode, loff_t offset, loff_t len) > > return -EINVAL; > > > > /* Return error if mode is not supported */ > > - if (mode && !(mode & FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE)) > > + if (mode && (mode & ~(FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE | FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE))) > Why not just: > if (mode & ~(FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE | FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE)) ? And BTW, since FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE does not change the file size, should not we enforce that FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE is / is not set? I don't mind too much which way but keeping it ambiguous (ignored) in the interface usually proves as a bad idea in future when we want to further extend the interface... Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
