On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 11:35 -0500, wkendall@xxxxxxx wrote: > plain text document attachment (node_alloc_cleanup) > Simplify the node allocation code. The current code takes some > number of nodes from a new segment and links them into the > freelist whenever the freelist is depleted. There's no reason > to put the new nodes on the freelist, we can just allocate the > next available new node as needed. This also saves a trip through > win_map/win_unmap if there are no nodes on the freelist (the > common case). Prior to your change, a node allocated off the "virgin" segment got zeroed before it gets returned for use. Your change eliminates that. Is that OK? You also dropped a few TREE_DEBUG messages. Were they not useful? (Just curious.) Otherwise looks good. Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Bill Kendall <wkendall@xxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
