On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 09:17:46AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 07:55:03PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > My tree is currently based on the VFS locking changes I have out for review, > > so there's a couple fo patches that won't apply sanely to a mainline or OSS xfs > > dev tree. See below for a pointer to a git tree with all the patches in it. > > The only think that should depend on it are the inode hash changes. I > suspect it might be a better idea if we feed those via Al together with > the VFS scalability bits, and only feed the rest through the XFS tree to > avoid having nasty dependencies. Yes, sounds reasonable. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
