On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 06:25:09AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > +/* > > + * buffer types > > + */ > > +#define B_FS_DQUOT 1 > > +#define B_FS_AGFL 2 > > +#define B_FS_AGF 3 > > +#define B_FS_ATTR_BTREE 4 > > +#define B_FS_DIR_BTREE 5 > > +#define B_FS_MAP 6 > > +#define B_FS_INOMAP 7 > > +#define B_FS_AGI 8 > > +#define B_FS_INO 9 > > Is there any good reason to keep/reintroduce the buffer types? In this > series we're only using the refcounts, and I can't see any good use for > the types either. I just wanted to use the existing hooks without modifying them to be plain "set reference" hooks. I'm not really fussed - this was just the simplest way to get the hookÑ working. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
