On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 07:55:11PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > now that we are using RCU protection for the inode cache lookups, > the lock is only needed on the modification side. Hence it is not > necessary for the lock to be a rwlock as there are no read side > holders anymore. Convert it to a spin lock to reflect it's exclusive > nature. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx> Looks good, and this will make Thomas happy given that XFS is now rwlock_t-free. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
