Does anybody have a report how XFS behaves on a NetApp storage with thin provisioning? They have a completely "weird" storage, their WAFL (write anywhere file layout) together with deduplication and other things make me think the best is to not-at-all specify any "performance options" in mkfs/mount, like sunit/swidth or largeio, swalloc, etc. Does someone have information on that? -- mit freundlichen GrÃssen, Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc it-management Internet Services http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee] Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31 ****** Radiointerview zum Thema Spam ****** http://www.it-podcast.at/archiv.html#podcast-100716 // Wir haben im Moment zwei HÃuser zu verkaufen: // http://zmi.at/langegg/ // http://zmi.at/haus2009/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
