Re: Best filesystems ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2010/10/24 Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Le Sat, 23 Oct 2010 19:13:08 +0100 vous Ãcriviez:
>
>> Its major limitation are internal complexity and should
>> Â only be used on 64b systems. It can support single filesystems
>> Â larger than 10-15TB, but that's stretching things.
>
> I currently take care of 100 servers with 20 to 80 TB XFS filesystems.
> Most are under heavy use, 95% filled for more than 3 years in a row,
> etc. I can safely affirm that XFS is definitely safe for anything up to
> 80 TB.
>
Which kernel version do you use? I occasionally found some errors like
"Input/output error" after sudden power failure under linux kernel
2.6.23.

> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Emmanuel Florac   |  Direction technique
> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â| Â Intellique
> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â| Â <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â| Â +33 1 78 94 84 02
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
>



-- 
The simplest is not all best but the best is surely the simplest!

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs



[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux