Re: XFS Test Results Interpretation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Montag, 25. Oktober 2010 Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > Kernel:  2.6.18-128.el5
> 
> You need a much newer kernel.  2.6.18 is ancient released in 2006,
> though CentOS have patched the bejesus out of it--128 times.

Oh, I didn't look at that.

2.6.18 is a performance killer compared to an actual 2.6.36 kernel. 
There's been so much work in between. If you can, try a 2.6.36 and 
compare your performance. Everything will be a lot faster than with 
2.6.18. You don't need to fiddle with mkfs/mount options, just upgrade 
the kernel and without any other tuning you will be much faster than 
before.

-- 
mit freundlichen Grüssen,
Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc

it-management Internet Services
http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee]
Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31

****** Radiointerview zum Thema Spam ******
http://www.it-podcast.at/archiv.html#podcast-100716

// Wir haben im Moment zwei Häuser zu verkaufen:
// http://zmi.at/langegg/
// http://zmi.at/haus2009/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux