Re: Best filesystems ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Samstag, 23. Oktober 2010 Peter Grandi wrote:
> * Reiser3 is nice with the right parameters for the few cases
>   where there is a significant number of small files on a small
>   storage system accessed by a single process.

I still use reiser3 for all servers root filesystems, it's very good for 
that. Never had a problem. 

For anything else I use XFS for performance reasons. Except for my KDE 
/home partition, that stays on reiserfs because KDE seems to rely on 
O_PONIES and crashes lead to zero size config files which is not a lot 
of fun.

-- 
mit freundlichen Grüssen,
Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc

it-management Internet Services
http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee]
Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31

****** Radiointerview zum Thema Spam ******
http://www.it-podcast.at/archiv.html#podcast-100716

// Wir haben im Moment zwei Häuser zu verkaufen:
// http://zmi.at/langegg/
// http://zmi.at/haus2009/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux