Re: [PATCH 00/11] xfstests: rework src/randholes.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 09:49:31AM -0500, Alex Elder wrote:
> Dave's recent "dynamic speculative EOF preallocation" changes
> caused test 008 to no longer produce the kinds of holes it was
> expecting to see, so it got me looking at the program it uses,
> "src/randholes.c".
> 
> Since 008 is the only test using this program, it probably
> doesn't deserve the attention I gave it yesterday, but I've
> done the work so I might as well submit the series for
> review and get my changes in.
> 
> The first patch in the series actually addresses two things
> that are bugs.
> 
> The remaining 10 are just cleanup and refactoring changes.
> Other than two bug fix changes and one change in output
> when running in very-verbose mode, the patched code should
> be pretty much functionally identical to before.

I haven't really looked at the whole series closely, but nothing
stands out as a red flag. Seeing it's test code, it's probably
OK to go as is. The bug fixes look fine.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs


[Index of Archives]     [Linux XFS Devel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux