On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 19:15 +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:17:05PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 16:44 +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > With the reclaim code separated from the generic walking code, it is > > > simple to implement batched lookups for the generic walk code. . . . > > The gang lookup should never return > > anything beyond the end of the AG. It seems > > like you ought to be able to detect when you've > > covered all the whole AG elsewhere, > > AFAICT, there are only two ways - the gang lookup returns nothing, > or we see the last valid inode number in the AG. If you can come up > with something that doesn't invlove a tree or inode number lookup, > I'm all ears.... I didn't have anything specific in mind and was basing this somewhat on gut feeling so you probably have the best solution as-is. But I'll look at your new code and if I come up with any bright ideas I'll let you know. -Alex _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
