On Mittwoch, 22. September 2010 Eric Sandeen wrote: > preallocation of each image before writing would help make it more > likely that each image is itself contiguous (but again this is not > -guaranteed-) If all images were 1-2MB large, and if there is no parallel create, but all images are copied after each other, wouldn't the mount option "allocsize=2M" be sufficient to ensure pics are contigous? I guess XFS would place them behind each other on disk, or why should there be gaps between? -- mit freundlichen Grüssen, Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc it-management Internet Services http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee] Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31 ****** Aktuelles Radiointerview! ****** http://www.it-podcast.at/aktuelle-sendung.html // Wir haben im Moment zwei Häuser zu verkaufen: // http://zmi.at/langegg/ // http://zmi.at/haus2009/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
