[ ... useless run of something misrepresented as a test ... ] >> Test run on a dual Opteron quad core, 16 GB RAM, kernel >> 2.6.32.11 x86_64... > This is a test of storage system performance, and you left out > the storage array specs? By doing so it seems you're stating > the underlying storage is not relevant to the results. [ ... ] This is only one of the several aspects of the waste of time that was misrepresented as a storage test, even if it is one of the funniest. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
