On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 20:56 +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > now that we are using RCU protection for the inode cache lookups, > the lock is only needed on the modification side. Hence it is not > necessary for the lock to be a rwlock as there are no read side > holders anymore. Convert it to a spin lock to reflect it's exclusive > nature. This is of course contingent on the correctness of the RCU change before this. But this one looks good. Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c | 16 ++++++++-------- _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
