On Mittwoch, 8. September 2010 Dave Chinner wrote: > > On machines with 32MiB or more 32k is the default, but most > > machines these days have multi-gigabytes of RAM, so at least for > > RAM>1GiB that could be made default. > > That is definitely not true. XFS is widely used in the embedded NAS > space, where memory is very limited and might be configured with > many filesystems. 32k is the default because those sorts of machines > can't afford to burn 2MB RAM per filesystem just in log buffers. > > Also, you can go and search the archives or git history as to why we > don't tune the logbsize based on physical memory size anymore, too. OK, then the man page should be updated to reflect this "newer logic". I've got the information directly from there. > You're getting the wrong information there. largeio affects the > output of the optimal IO size reported by stat(2). 'stat -f" does > a statfs(2) call. Try 'stat /disk/db/<file> --format %o'.... Ah, that's better, thank you :-) > > And while I am at it: Why does "mount" not provide the su=/sw= > > options that we can use to create a filesystem? Would make life > > easier, as it's much easier to read su=64k,sw=7 than > > sunit=128,swidth=896. > > You should never, ever need to use the mount options. ..except when a disk is added to the RAID, or it's RAID level gets changed. Then sw=7 becomes sw=8 or so - or better said: would become, as then you must use the (I call it strange, error prone) semantics of sunit/swidth. > > When I defined su/sw on mkfs, is it enough, or would I always have > > to specify sunit/swidth with every mount too? > > Yes, no. mkfs.xfs stores sunit/swidth on disk in the superblock. So when I add a disk, I must only once mount with the new sunit/swidth, and that is stored? That's nice. -- mit freundlichen Grüssen, Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc it-management Internet Services http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee] Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31 ****** Aktuelles Radiointerview! ****** http://www.it-podcast.at/aktuelle-sendung.html // Wir haben im Moment zwei Häuser zu verkaufen: // http://zmi.at/langegg/ // http://zmi.at/haus2009/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs