On Montag, 6. September 2010 Eric Sandeen wrote: > People need to read up a little and know what they're tuning; > repeating this kind of suggestion leads to cargo-cultism for > performance "tuning" > > IOW don't turn knobs just because they are there ... :) Other than most who write here I'm not a developer, but a sysadmin, responsible for servers of all kind of ages, with XFS usage back to the early 2.6 series. Default mount options use to change sometimes, and I can't always check that after a system/kernel upgrade the default options are satisfied or not. So specifying everything is safe, and doesn't do any harm - right? And as it was Sunday morning, I wanted to help out Willy quickly, without looking specifically which options he would need. I was sure some of you who know it would guide him later, but maybe only on Monday, so I took that quick path to find a solution. -- mit freundlichen Grüssen, Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc it-management Internet Services http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee] Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31 ****** Aktuelles Radiointerview! ****** http://www.it-podcast.at/aktuelle-sendung.html // Wir haben im Moment zwei Häuser zu verkaufen: // http://zmi.at/langegg/ // http://zmi.at/haus2009/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
