On Montag, 16. August 2010 Stan Hoeppner wrote: > Why does "everyone" on this list "reply-to-all" when 99% of the time > it is totally unnecessary, redundant, and potentially ruffles a > sender's feathers, as in this case? I'm also on several lists, but the only list where reply-to-all is used is this one - so I followed the way it's done here without having questioned why. -- mit freundlichen Grüssen, Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc it-management Internet Services http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee] Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31 ****** Aktuelles Radiointerview! ****** http://www.it-podcast.at/aktuelle-sendung.html // Wir haben im Moment zwei Häuser zu verkaufen: // http://zmi.at/langegg/ // http://zmi.at/haus2009/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
