----- "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Nathan, hi Anibal, > > if seen the constant flipping between native and non-native uploads > for the xfsprogs Debian packages between the two of you and it's > slightly annoying. I know Nathan likes maintaining the Debian > packages > in git, which also makes life for us XFS developers trying to build > debian packages a lot easier. > > What about a compromise? We'll add a debian-<dist> branches to the > xfsprogs-dev repository where we can track the exact packages > uploaded > to Debian, including the -2/-3 etc packages revisions that only get > uploaded to Debian, IMO, the -2 and -3 revisions are unnecessary and there's really no need for a separate branch ... if Anibal had a kernel.org account and merged changes in before uploading, there'd be no issue, I think - Anibal? It would make life simpler, for sure. > And one last request, any chance to get xfsprogs for -testing rebuilt > against libblkid now that util-linux-2.17 has finally made it into > testing? Beeing able to use blkid for alignment detection will be > very important so that XFS on Debian can deal with 4k sector disks > and hardware RAID arrays out of the box. Sure, I'll take a look at that for next upload. cheers. -- Nathan _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
