> I'm pleased to state that using the experimental "delaylog" mount option > (in vanilla linux-2.6.35) we measured a 17% performance increase > for our benchmark scenario. (Other mount-options in use both before > and after the "delaylog" option: noatime,nodiratime,nobarrier) > That's a lot given that XFS was the fastest performing file-system > for this application already. > So thanks to all contributing developers for this significant optimization! I did a benchmark (a simple copy/untar not something fancy) some time ago and also noticed great improvement. Here is my post with the results of the benchmark. http://lordkhelben.wordpress.com/2010/07/08/xfs-delayed-logging/ _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
