On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 01:23:29AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:38:15AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > The following patches fix excessive CPU consumption during inode > > cache shrinking when filesystems have lots of allocation groups as > > well as prevent a couple of lockdep reports that were found during > > testing. Also included is a fix for a reclaim recursion deadlock > > when allocating memory during inode initialisation. > > Wa the overlap of patch 1 with the for-2.6.35 shrinker series > intentional? In addition to patch 1 patches 3 to 5 are also for-2.6.35 > material in my opinion. I realised that we'd get a messy, messy conflict if I separated the per-ag tree reclaim tracking from the shrinker patchset, so I included it in that one as it was also part of fixing reported XFS shrinker regressions to avoid such conflicts. But yes, i think that all the lockdep fixes are probably 2.6.35 material. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
